20090708

The First Of Many Complaints Under The New Foreclosure Consultant Law


Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. today sued a foreclosure consultant and an attorney -- Paul Noe Jr. and Mitchell Roth - who conned 2,000 desperate homeowners into paying exorbitant fees for "phony lawsuits" to forestall foreclosure proceedings. These lawsuits were filed and abandoned, even though homeowners were charged $1,800 in upfront fees, at least $1,200 per month and contingency fees of up to 80 percent of their home's value.
"Noe and Roth ripped off homeowners desperate for help by charging unconscionable fees for phony lawsuits," Brown said. "Instead of aggressively pursuing the lawsuits, Noe and Roth strung them along so they could continue to rake in fees." Beginning in mid-2008, Noe promised homeowners facing foreclosure or default he could help them lower or eliminate their mortgage debt. He convinced more than 2,000 homeowners to sign "joint venture" agreements with his company, United First, and hire Roth to file suits claiming that the borrower's loan was invalid because the mortgages had been sold so many times on Wall Street that the lender could not demonstrate who owned it. Similar suits in other states have never resulted in the elimination of the borrower's mortgage debt. After filing the lawsuits, Roth did virtually nothing to advance the cases. He often failed to make required court filings, respond to legal motions, comply with court deadlines, or appear at court hearings. Instead, Roth's firm simply tried to extend the lawsuits as long as possible in order to collect additional monthly fees. Under the terms of the agreement, United First charged homeowners approximately $1,800 in upfront fees, plus at least $1,200 per month. If the case was settled, homeowners were required to pay 50 percent of the cash value of the settlement. For example, if United First won a $100,000 reduction of the mortgage debt, the homeowner would have to pay United First a fee of $50,000. If United First completely eliminated the homeowner's debt, the homeowner would be required to pay the company 80 percent of the value of the home.
Brown's lawsuit contends that Noe, Roth and United First: - Violated California's credit counseling and foreclosure consultant laws, Civil Code sections 1789 and 2945; - Inserted unconscionable terms in contracts; - Engaged in improper running and capping, meaning that Roth improperly partnered with United First, Inc. and Noe, who were not lawyers, to generate business for his law firm violating California Business and Professions Code 6150; and - Violated 17500 of the California Business and Professions Code. Brown's office is seeking $2 million in civil penalties, full restitution for victims, and a permanent injunction to keep the company and the defendants from offering foreclosure consultant services. Paul Noe Jr. was convicted of wire fraud in 1989 and the subject of a California Department of Insurance Cease and Desist Order in 2004. Mitchell Roth resigned for the California State Bar in late May 2009, after the State Bar closed his law firm.

More Lenders and Servicers Participating in Obama Mortgage Program



Since the Making Home Affordable Program was rolled out earlier this year, several more lenders and servicers have signed on to participate. Whether they are really cooperating and complying with the program remains to be seen. Here is the current list:


Amalgamated Bank *
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-866-725-0647
Aurora Loan Services LLC
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-800-550-0508
Bank of America, N.A.
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-800-846-2222
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-800-457-5105
CCO Mortgage
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-800-234-6006
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-888-267-2417
Chase Financial LLC
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-866-550-5705
CitiMortgage, Inc.
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-866-915-9417
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-800-669-6607
Ditech *
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-866-899-5308
EMC Mortgage Corporation *
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-866-550-5705
Etrade *
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-866-344-0552
First Federal Savings and Loan
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-800-800-1577
GMAC Mortgage LLC
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-800-766-4622
Green Tree Servicing LLC
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-800-643-0202
Home Loan Services, Inc.
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-800-622-5035
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA *
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-866-550-5705
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-888-850-9398
Ocwen Financial Corporation, Inc.
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-800-746-2936
RG Mortgage Corporation
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-888-264-4674
Residential Credit Solutions
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-800-737-1192
Saxon Mortgage Services
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-800-594-8422
Select Portfolio Servicing
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-888-818-6032
Wachovia Mortgage, FSB
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-800-922-4684
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-800-678-7986
Wescom Central Credit Union
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-888-493-7266
Wilshire Credit Corporation
http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/contact_servicer.html#TB_inline?height=200&width=300&inlineId=leaveSite
1-888-502-0100

20090430

Obama's Second Lien Program Bridges The Gap



Since the Home Affordable Mortgage program was announced on March 4, 2009, those in the business of loan modifications had a reasonable chance of success with homes with only one mortgage, but were left with a gap in solutions in regard to homes that were encumbered by first and second liens. Often the second liens were large, and despite a modification to 31% of gross income on the first, the second holders were not always participating or cooperating. Nevertheless, twelve servicers, including the five largest, have now signed contracts and begun modifications under the program. Between loans covered by these servicers and loans owned or securitized by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, more than 75 percent of all loans in the country are now covered by the Making Home Affordable Program.

Today, the details of a new plan to address this gap were announced. Under the Second Lien Program, when a Home Affordable Modification is initiated on a first lien, servicers participating in the Second Lien Program will automatically reduce payments on the associated second lien according to a pre-set protocol. Alternatively, servicers will have the option to extinguish the second lien in return for a lump sum payment under a pre-set formula determined by Treasury, allowing servicers to target principal extinguishment to the borrowers where extinguishment is most appropriate.

Essentially, if the second is an amortizing loan (interest and principal payments), the interest rate is reduced to 1% and the term is extended to match the term on the modified first. i.e, 30 years, 40 years, etc. Next, if the first loan involved principal forbearance, the principal on the second is proportionately reduced. If the second is an interest only loan, the interest is reduced to 2%, the term is extended to match the modified first and if the first involves principal forebearance, the second is proportionately reduced. These modifications are in effect for 5 years at which point the interest rate goes up to the same rate as the first, subject to caps.
In theory, the Obama modification programs are really good news for most struggling in this economy with mortgages. What remains to be seen is how the lenders actually apply these new programs, and quite frankly, whether they can be staffed adequately to actually implement the programs as intended. At this stage of the loan modification game, you still get the entry level customer support person that tells you something different than you were told last week, that you documents were lost, that you should call back in a few weeks, that it will be 90 days before you have an answer, or, sorry, we already foreclosed on your house while you were waiting for your loan modification. Here is to hoping.....

20090421

The Spotlight Is On Loan Modification Scammers

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy



It is a great time to be in the loan modifcation business. With the introduction of the Obama plan last month, lenders are more willing than ever to modify loans, including interest rate reductions, term increases, and where necessary, principal forebearance or reduction. It is a great time, that is, if you are a legitimate loan modification company, one that is complying with all state and federal laws. If not, you better watch your back. In a press conference on April 9, 2009, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner revealed that the long arm will now focus on loan modification scammers, and they will be prosecuted.

"American homeowners have been through enough in the past few years," Geithner said, adding that the last thing they need is to get scammed as they struggle to keep their homes.

"These predatory scams callously rob Americans of their savings and potentially their homes," he said. "We will shut down fraudulent companies more quickly than before. We will target companies that otherwise would have gone unnoticed under the radar."

Unfortunately, this could mean you. Despite the fact that you may be attempting to run a legitimate business, you may not be. The rules are complicated and complex for a layperson to wade through, especially if you are trying to do business in more than one state. Don't be naive enough to think that because you aren't stealing houses or equity skimming that your good intentions will get you through the great inquisition about your business practices. You are either in compliance with the law, or you are not, and your good intentions don't enter into the equation.

20081231

Beware Of Those Bearing Loan Modification Gifts

10% of homeowners in the US are in foreclosure or behind on their mortgage payments today and the news isn't getting better. Regardless of who is at fault, the situation is taking an emotional toll on many American families and they are desperate for some relief. Unfortunately, this desperation is leading to a new breed of predators--foreclosure rescue scams and loan modification experts. I am shocked to hear that only a few states actually regulate these practices and this new category of "white knight" is quietly slipping through the cracks. If the company you are considering isn't complying with all the rules, you don't want to do business with them.

If you are in mortgage trouble in California and want to know what options are available to you, consider these guidelines:


  • The Department of Real Estate regulates anyone offering to negotiate loan modifications, short sales, deeds in lieu of foreclosure or something else related to your mortgage. EVERYONE (except lawyers) offering to modify your mortgage loan must have a real estate broker's license or have a real estate salesperson's license under a broker. Before hiring a company, check their license status with the Department of Real Estate.
  • Only brokers with an accepted advance fee agreement may collect advance fees, so, check with the Department of Real Estate's approved list of brokers before paying anything up front for a loan modification. If you have a Notice of Default filed against your property, do not pay advance fees to a broker.
  • Lawyers and their paralegals are exempt from these rules IF you are hiring a lawyer. Do not be swayed by Loan Modification companies claiming to be "Attorney Backed". If you call an 800 number, speak to a sales rep who signs you up for a loan modification and then transfers the file to a negotiator, you are not hiring a lawyer. The organizations who have phantom lawyers who never meet with the clients, never review the file, never negotiate with the lender on behalf of the client and split fees are not complying with the DRE and State Bar of California rules.
Be cautious--make sure that the expert you are hiring is qualified. Before signing up for any service, confirm that you understand what relief you can expect from the service and that you know exactly what you are going to pay. Most importantly, clarify what options you have if the expert is unsuccessful in reaching a resolution for you.

20081011

California Cracks Down On Those Who Seek To Foreclose


I just love California. Blue state full of fruits and nuts as they say, but we get it done. While the rest of the country wrings their hands about the foreclosure crisis, we take action and do something! In an effort to keep people in their homes and alleviate the economic slump in the housing market, Senate Bill 1137 ratchets up the pressure on lenders who foreclose on the fast track. Under the new law, lenders are required to initiate contact and attempt to work out a loan modification program with struggling borrowers not only as a service to them, but also to investors who own the loans. Here are the highlights:

1. Mandatory requirement for lenders to meet with borrowers: Effective September 8, 2008, a lender may not file a notice of default until 30 days after contacting a borrower to assess the borrower's financial situation and explore options for avoiding foreclosure. A lender must generally contact the borrower in person or by telephone, or satisfy due diligence requirements for contacting a borrower. During the initial contact, the lender must inform the borrower of the right to request a meeting with the lender within 14 days. The lender must also give the borrower the toll-free number for finding a HUD-certified housing counseling agency. This requirement to contact borrowers applies to loans secured by owner-occupied residences made from 2003 to 2007.

2. Lender Maintenance of Foreclosed Homes: Effective July 8, 2008, anyone who acquires property through foreclosure must maintain the exterior of vacant residential property. Violations of this law include permitting excessive foliage growth that diminishes the value of surrounding properties, failing to take action against trespassers or squatters, failing to take action to prevent mosquitoes from breeding in standing water, or other public nuisances. This law authorizes a governmental entity to impose a civil fine up to $1,000 per day for any violation, as long as the owner has been given notice and an opportunity to remedy the violation.

3. 60-Day Notice to Terminate Tenants: Effective July 8, 2008, a tenant or subtenant in possession of a rental housing unit that has been sold through foreclosure is generally entitled to a 60-day written notice to quit, not just 30 days.

While I am not that optimistic that requiring the lenders to meet and confer with borrowers to try and work out a loan modification will really change things, the penalty requiring the lenders to maintain the houses that they foreclose on or pay a penalty of $1000 per day will definitely hit home! The logistics of maintaining property and hiring attorneys to respond to the imposition of fines will be burdensome, so hopefully, the motivation to resolve problem loans will increase and benefit the whole econcomy.

20080817

Countrywide Foreclosure House-$93,000. Mummified Body-Free

Randy Johnson, a troubled man who had not been seen since 2005, fell asleep for the last time in a little Victorian house that he grew up in on the South side of Chicago. When the new owners of 4578 S. Oakenwald Ave arrived at the house they had purchased at a foreclosure sale for $93,000 in January 2008, they found Johnson's mummified body sitting in a rocker next to a dead dog. Wow.....a whole new level of the "if I don't look I will see no evil" underwriting standards that we have seen at Countrywide. This story would have probably remained a local neighborhood tale if it hadn't been for the new player in the blame game.

Ticor Title, one of the largest title insurance firms in the country, is suing Countrywide Home Loans, saying it shouldn't have to pay out on a title policy because of Countrywide's gross negligence. The legitimate owner of the property, Arriella Johnson, Randy's mother, had died in 2001, but title to the property had changed hands 3 times since 2006 as a result of forgery and other acts of skullduggery. The Chicago Tribune reports:

"The gruesome discovery prompted Cook County Public Administrator Michael Bender to look into the case. Bender's staff quickly determined the backdated deed that had transferred the home from Johnson's deceased mother, Arrellia Johnson, to a woman named Rhonda Evans was a fake, and not all that hard to spot. Arrellia Johnson's name was spelled two ways and the alleged 1996 warranty deed was created on the stationery of Recorder of Deeds Eugene Moore, who did not take office until 1999. Another warning sign: The deed was notarized by Mae Evans, who is the mother of Rhonda Evans. Three months after the fraudulent deed was recorded, Evans sold the house to Donald Franklin of Harvey for $450,000. Franklin borrowed the entire amount in two simultaneous mortgages from Countrywide. He made one payment, defaulted and Countrywide foreclosed. After the body was discovered, the public administrator asked the court to restore the property to the heirs of Arriella Johnson, taking it from Countrywide.


Because the Franklin loan never should have gotten out of Countrywide's underwriting department, the suit says, Ticor "has no duty to defend Countrywide in connection with this matter and owes no other duties to Countrywide under the policy."The lawsuit reveals some details that show the Evans family was even more deeply involved in the transaction than was previously known. For instance, Franklin didn't apply directly to Countrywide. His application was made to E&I Funding, a mortgage broker owned by Rhonda Evans' brother, Edwin Evans, and his wife, Iva. The loan was transferred to Countrywide the same day and Countrywide immediately confirmed a "lock" on Franklin's package. On his application, Franklin described himself as a 28-year-old single man earning almost $12,000 a month as an excavator for Class Act Construction. A quick search of Class Act would have shown that firm also was owned by Edwin Evans a convicted rapist, bank robber and worthless guy who had been recently indicted on mortgage fraud. Four days after it received the application, Countrywide issued an underwriting report noting Franklin's credit was "acceptable" and his ability to repay was "good," according to the lawsuit. It also called out several things that had to be resolved before the loan would go through, including verification of Franklin's employment and an explanation of where $14,500 in a savings had come from. Meanwhile, Countrywide hired Ticor Title to do a title search of the property. The housing market was still going great guns at this point, and Ticor was so busy, it subcontracted the title search to a Lombard firm called Tri-Star Title---the now defunct and under investigation for mortgage fraud Tri-Star Title.

This is an important lawsuit for Ticor and other title companies since one victory could lead to another flood of litigation. Experts are split on whether Ticor will prevail in this lawsuit. Some say it is merely a tactic to pile on the Countrywide negative press train and pass on some of the blame for their own "see no evil" approach, while others say proper review of the application would have led to a rejection before a title policy even came up in conversation. Stay tuned for this whole new version of Monopoly Unplugged. Imagine picking a Chance card that reads: "Dead body found in house you just bought at foreclosure sale. Pay $300 to fumigate house."